![ez pocket cash ez pocket cash](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/QhwAAOSwqTVgNvH9/s-l300.jpg)
I have many old books that I have gone through. I do understand that going through the references is part of paying your dues: no argument there. In any case, it gives you a feeling that you "own" the trick and a deeper understanding of what motivates it. Sometimes it shows us "dead ends" that have already been travelled by enough people.
#Ez pocket cash how to
Sometimes the history of a particular piece contains hints as to how to make a particular piece better or more deceiving. Historical research is, IMHO, a necessary part of learning any particular type of magic, if only to know where what we are doing came from. However, now that you have had a chance to look at some of the material, let me explain something about the research process. I know that last post might have had a rather harsh tone to it. It has much of the information you need, and I don't feel like cutting and pasting it over here. Read the history page in the cups and balls museum. He had been doing that routine for some time, because a variation of it was published in the Stars of Magic a few years earlier. Vernon didn't just sit down and say "Today, I'll invent my own routine for the cups and balls." He took other material, worked on it, tried new things, worked some more, and eventually came up with the routine that was published about 1957 or so in The Dai Vernon Book of Magic. How would you ever get the idea that Vernon was the first person to do the cups and balls? The first time a routine for it appeared in print was in 1634.
![ez pocket cash ez pocket cash](https://i5.walmartimages.com/asr/211f4b14-189e-4191-8bb5-67e4fac2a813.859de7899e11ccb48afbc67a5e7367d0.jpeg)
It's a trick that has evolved over millenia. You seem to think that there was "A date" that cements the first performer to do the cups and balls. Going through those references is part of paying your dues.